[lqfb-main] Yet another proposal for application of Schulze Method for referendums

[Jan Behrens]

On 06/01/11 03:37, Jan Behrens wrote:
> The SSS approach prohibits this, but using the normal smith set instead
> of the Supermajority Smith Set (SSS) already fixes the problem, while
> being less conservative about the status quo (in most cases, i think)

And in the few cases, where the SSS approach is less conservative about 
the status quo (as it includes a possible winner, which is not included 
in the normal smith set), then the property "when the status quo had won 
in the absence of supermajority requirements, then it also wins in the 
presence of supermajority requirements" is violated!

This is another argument for using the normal smith set instead of the 
supermajority smith set.

Regards
Jan Behrens